Application: Nuclear Reaction Networks#
Reaction Rates#
Nuclear experiments provide us with reaction rates of the form (for a 2-body reaction):
where \(n_A\) is the number density of species A and \(n_B\) is the number density of species B. The denominator ensures that we don’t double count for a species reacting with itself. The term \(\langle \sigma v \rangle\) is the average of the cross section and velocity over the distribution of velocities in the frame of the reaction. This is what is measured by experiements.
Here the rate, \(r\), has units of reactions / time / volume.
Structure of a Network#
A reaction network is a set of nuclei and the rates that link them together. Consider 4 nuclei, \(A\), \(B\), \(C\), and \(D\), linked by 2 rates:
we would describe these as a set of ODEs for each species. In terms of number density, it is straightforward to write down:
Here the first equation says that we lose 2 nuclei \(A\) for each \(A + A\) reaction and we gain 1 nuclei \(A\) for each \(B + C\) reaction. The factor of 1/2 in the first term is because when \(A\) reacts with itself, we don’t want to double count the number of pairs.
Molar fractions#
We can instead write this in terms of molar or mass fractions. Mass fractions are defined as the mass of the species relative to the total mass of all species in a volume, or
These have the property
Molar fractions are scaled by the atomic weight:
where \(Y_k\) is the molar fraction of species \(k\), \(X_k\) is the mass fraction, and \(A_k\) is the atomic weight. Number density is related to mass fraction as:
where \(N_A\) is Avogadro’s number and \(m_u\) is the atomic mass unit (\(m_u = 1/N_A\)).
Substituting these into the above expression we get
This is often the form we write the system of ODEs in when we write a network.
Note
Reaction rate compilations often provide fits or tabulations of the quantity \(N_A \langle \sigma v\rangle\).
Mass fractions#
An alternate form of the system is to express it as an ODE system of mass fractions. Here we note that:
The system will appear a bit more complicated since the atomic weights now explicitly appear. For example, the evolution equation of species \(A\) will be:
Note
The molar fraction system has the advantage that the coefficients are the same as the stoichiometric coefficients of the rate equations.
While the mass fraction system has the advantage that by construction,
Either system will give the same evolution.
Integrating the Network#
We often need to integrate this system together with an energy equation to capture the evolution of the temperature as reactions progress, since the reaction rates are highly-temperature sensitive.
But even without an energy equation, this system is difficult to integrate because there can be a wide range of timescales involved in the reaction rates, which makes the system a stiff system of ODEs. We need to use different methods from the explicit Runge-Kutta methods we often use.